Adventures In Netflix #9-Gabriel Ricard

June 2nd, 2008
Adventures in Netflix #9
By Gabriel Ricard
 
Technically, I wouldn’t call what he was doing the Werewolves of London. But since he had a gun in his hand, I felt obligated to humor him as best I could.
 
And that’s the story of my senior prom.
 
Anyway, welcome once again to another edition of Adventures in Netflix.
 
By God, are we staring down the barrel of another slow month? It sure seems like it. The SAG (Screen Actor’s Guild, for those of you playing the home game) might go on strike. Which would certainly be somewhere in the neighborhood of less than awesome. But really, after everything we went through with the WGA (Writer’s Guild of America), I’m not sure I can expand enough energy to care about actors. I have a hard enough time getting my apathy to shut up long enough to worry about mass genocide and global warming.
 
Though I’m sure I’ll be singing a much different death-march tune when and if it actually goes down.
 
Well, no sense worrying about it now.
 
But of course, it’s almost impossible to go a full month without losing one of the good ones. This month, it was Sidney Pollack, who passed on just days ago at the age of seventy-three. I became more aware of who he was at a fairly later point from when I started caring about film entirely too much. But prior to that, I had seen and loved a number of his films and recognized him in several of the movies and television he happened to pop in as one of those great background characters who lent himself well to whatever movie he happened to be in. He was a good actor, but he was even better as a director and producer. As a director, he was responsible for a wide range of great films such as Tootsie, The Way We Were, Out of Africa (which nabbed him Best Director and Best Picture Oscars), Jeremiah Johnson, The Yakuza, They Shoot Horses, Don’t They? and several others. As a producer, he was responsible in one way or another for helping to shape films like The Fabulous Baker Boys, Cold Mountain, Michael Clayton, The Talented Mr. Ripley, and The Quiet American, amongst others.
 
In other words, it’s a pretty damn good body of work on all fronts.
 
The films he made himself almost always had a particular interest in people. His films almost always had the technical side nailed down beautifully, but I think what I like about his films more than that is the way he was able to focus on the characters in even his broadest movies. He was clearly a director who knew what he wanted and how to go about getting it, but it would also seem that he was smart enough to know when to let the talent in front of the camera dictate the pace and the story. Nearly every film he made that I’ve seen had that rare quality of being able to combine the two modes of thought to great effect. He never wrote any of the screenplays he directed or produced, but that didn’t make them any less distinctive. His films always had a sense of being very specifically crafted, very tirelessly worked over in every area.
 
He was a great filmmaker, a talented character actor and a sharp producer.
 
Even at seventy-three, which isn’t all that old in my mind, it’s still a shame that he had to head out the door.
And then, of course, we had to lose Harvey Korman and Joe Pevney as well. Korman will probably best be known for his work with Mel Brooks (and if you haven’t seen Blazing Saddles yet, well, shame on you) and Carol Burnett. Pevney worked as a director, but I’ll wager he’ll be best remembered for writing many of the all-time great episodes in the original Star Trek series (including City on The Edge of Forever and The Trouble With Tribbles).
Both men were fairly up there in years (Pevney was into his 90’s), but that doesn’t make their deaths any less of a shame.
Now then, let’s get into it.
 

Gone, Baby, Gone (2007)

Directed by: Ben Affleck
Written by: Aaron Stockard, Ben Affleck
Starring: Casey Affleck, Morgan Freeman, Amy Ryan
 
When it was announced that Ben Affleck had a project coming down the pike that he was not only going to co-write but direct as well, my reaction was pretty much the same as everyone else’s. Something along the lines of “Really? No, seriously. Come on. I’m serious. This isn’t funny. No, really, you’re upsetting me. Stop it. Now. Stop it now. I’ll tell. I will. I swear to fu—”
 
And so on.
 
Because even though I’m a longtime supporter of the idea that Ben is a talented actor who just happens to have a habit of choosing really bad movies that he couldn’t save with the blessing of Christ himself, I couldn’t see him pulling this off. Yeah, he co-wrote Good Will Hunting and probably had some say in the actual shoot, but that was a whole other deal to me. This was Ben without Gus Van Sant and Matt Damon to back him up. Even when I took a look at the extremely promising cast and crew, I still didn’t like his chances.
 
But then the thing came out, got electrifyingly positive reviews across the board and even snagged an Oscar nomination for Amy Ryan. As such, I saw myself as having no choice but to rent the damn thing and see if it was worth all the fuss and comeback trail attention it was getting for Affleck. To my surprise, it met my paper-thin expectations head on and left them bleeding in an alley behind one of the rundown, world-weary bars that the world of the film captures so well throughout. Thanks to the incredible cinematography by John Toll (Braveheart and a number of Cameron Crowe films).
 
The first thing to really keep in mind, however, is that the script itself, written by Affleck and Aaron Stockard, is a damn good adaptation of the novel by Dennis Lehane (who also wrote the novel Clint Eastwood’s Mystic River comes from). Strictly going on the dialogue and pacing, Affleck clearly had something good to work with coming out of the gate. And it just seems to get better and better for him. Starting with the cast. Casey Affleck has been sort of hovering on the radar for years now, turning in good work but never getting quite the level of recognition he deserved. After this and The Assassination of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford, he shouldn’t have much to worry about in that department. As Patrick Kenzie, a private detective and native of the neighborhood in which the young girl of a painfully irresponsible mother (Amy Ryan), Casey delivers the kind of performance that can bring someone to the main stage and keep them there for a good, long time. Affleck has had featured roles before, but this is probably the first time he’s ever really been the main player responsible for setting a pace that the rest of the cast has to follow. Kenzie is almost viciously driven in his desire to do the right thing. You pick that up right from the beginning, watching him prove that nepotism from big brother Ben doesn’t even stand a chance of factoring into it. His journey from reluctantly accepting the job from the child’s aunt and uncle, Amy Madigan and Titus Welliver both knocking it right out of the park as the kind of lower-middle class victims of life in general who have no choice but to live as battered ghosts age forty going on ninety, to the point where he has to choose between seeing the case through to the end and risking everything he has is the core of the film. Ben obviously knew what his brother was capable of. He is never anything less than being in complete control of not only the character but our attention as well.
 
He has an amazing supporting cast to work with. Morgan Freeman doesn’t have a whole lot to do for most of the film, but it probably shouldn’t surprise you anyway that he still makes the absolute most of it. He’s done the weary thing before. What separates it this time is the restraint he brings to a man who is driven in much the same way Affleck is, but with an element of personal loss and countless years of experience that Freeman doesn’t even have to use words to dictate. Ed Harris does much of the same in the kind of role usually limited to playing the standard territorial cop. Both of them are perfect for the kind of veteran performance that’s essential to their characters. They are the end result of the vigilance that pushes Affleck ever forward. But the real standout of the supporting cast is almost certainly Ryan as the kind of mother you wouldn’t be comfortable leaving your goldfish with. Anyone can play a bad mother. It takes serious talent to go deeper than that and come back with a performance that encompasses a woman who is forced to face her demons and come to terms with who and what she is. Not to mention what she is willing to sacrifice to see her daughter again. Ryan nails that mark with an almost staggering clarity that is sure to echo the eerily similar losers you probably know in real life.
 
As good as everyone is though, such as Michelle Monaghan taking the role as Kenzie’s girlfriend well beyond its usually thankless position, it’s director Affleck who deserves credit for reining everything in. Anyone can load up a film with great talent. Surrounded by so many talented individuals, including the great editing by William Goldenberg, the confidence in his direction and in his ability to give everything just the right balance is impressive stuff for a first-timer. He knew exactly what he needed, and he understood that it was going to be the performances and the pacing that would determine if this thing sank or swam. And in capturing the run-down exhaustion of a time and place well past the point of miracles, it’s no small exaggeration to say that Gone Baby Gone swims as well as any experienced director could hope for. The devil is almost certainly in the details of the story, the cast and crew. That’s just common sense. As far as first films go, Affleck succeeds on every front. This is a film well worth examining. Just as Affleck is well worth paying attention to for whenever he decides to go for a second shot.
 

Michael Clayton (2007)

Directed by: Tony Gilroy
Written by: Tony Gilroy
Starring: George Clooney, Tom Wilkinson, Tilda Swinton
 
Writing a great screenplay is fine. It’s pretty damn essential to the makings of a good movie. Michael Clayton writer/director Tony Gilroy has managed that feat a few times now. Most of all, with all three chapters in the Bourne trilogy. It’s another thing altogether though when that has to translate to good direction as well.
 
You have to give Gilroy credit. Much in the same way that Ben Affleck knew to surround himself with a talented cast and crew in Gone, Baby, Gone¸ Gilroy knew that his first time in the director’s chair had to have all the makings of a hell of a good team to back him up. But even with a great script, an excellent cast and the backing of people like Sidney Pollack (who pops in the supporting cast in addition to his title as one of the film’s producers), it all comes back to Gilroy and what he can make of the talent and story in front of him. And much in the same way Affleck smashed expectations and delivered a remarkable piece of filmmaking for a newcomer, Gilroy takes the opportunity to do something truly impressive and runs with it a good several hundred more miles than most of us might have been willing to guess. It went far enough for the film to score seven Oscar nominations. Including Best Picture and Best Director.
 
Again, it goes back to his terrific story of a man (Clooney as the title character) who has dedicated most of his life to his job. Working as “a fixer” (as in, someone who fixes problems) for the clients of one of the largest and most prestigious law firms in the world. What that’s gotten him is middle age, strained personal relationships and a hefty debt to the mob that serves as a well-executed backdrop to the main story. It’s a character study more distinctive than anything Clooney has done so far. The power of his performances comes in his understanding that the weariness of his character can come across in everything from a casual conversation with his young son to the way he walks to his car from a late-night poker game. He’s good at his job, and Clooney has always had a great movie-star knack for playing professionals who do their work better than anyone, but he adds something significant to underscore the usual confidence he lends to these people. Clooney shows that even though Clayton might be good at his job that it doesn’t really mean anything significant to anyone when it’s all said and done behind closed doors. It’s even more potent when it’s made clear that Clayton has known this sad reality for quite some time and yet chose to continue on autopilot. And pushing into his forties, it’s only getting worse. In the end, the most he has to show for his years of service is a reputation that won’t even buy him a cup of coffee and a close friendship to a man named Arthur Eden (Tom Wilkinson), a manic-depressive lawyer in the firm. Whose latest nervous breakdown inadvertently draws Clayton into a possible scandal involving the agrochemical company they happen to be defending against a family who suffered grievously at the hands of one of their products.
 
It’s because of this that both Clayton and Eden’s paths cross with that of an executive at the agrochemical company, Karen Chowder (Tilda Swinton), an emotionally crippled, insecure woman who will do anything to protect not only her business interests but the years of life she has surrendered in the name of her career. Though her actions occasionally suggest otherwise, she’s really no different than Clayton or Eden. Swinton is talented enough to make us see this while still allowing us hate her character for any number of the brutally underhanded things she does to get what she wants. To me, the surprising thing isn’t that she won Best Supporting Actress for the role. What surprises me is that she didn’t won one a lot sooner. She’s been that good for years, and Clayton serves as a culmination of for the brilliant performances and diverse personalities she’s stepped into in film after film.
 
And if you think Clooney and Swinton are good, then Wilkinson as the psychologically battered Arthur Eden will really floor your expectations. From his manic monologue that opens the film and drops us unceremoniously into its world to his meeting with Arthur at the police station, Wilkinson delivers what is easily the best performance of his consistently stellar career as one of the best character actors in the business. Playing a person like Arthur Eden is no easy task, especially when it comes to avoiding the pitfalls of turning his insanity into a one-note exercise in choking on each and every scene. Wilkinson avoids every single one of those potential moments, but still has a very obvious good time with the roller-coaster madness that overwhelms Eden from the first moment we meet him. It’s electrifying to watch and it keeps pretty good time with the A-game mentality that the rest of the cast brings to the proceedings. Pollack in particular is excellent lending his consistently solid acting talent to the film in his final acting role.
 
As solid a story as there is in Michael Clayton¸ Gilroy is also smart and talented enough to not let the actors get lost in the twists and turns. He knows that this is in the end a character study on a fairly large stage for that sort of thing. This stage moves briskly and wonderfully alongside the cinematography of Robert Elswit (who coincidently won an Oscar this year for another major contender, No Country For Old Men) and a memorable score by James Newton Howard. The story and all the other necessary ingredients stand strong enough to get me interested in Gilroy’s next move, but it’s the performances that give the film an air of durability that deserves to be held up as an example of the talents of its cast decades down the road. That’s something you don’t need an Oscar for.
 

Millennium: The Complete First Season (1996)

Directed by: David Nutter, etc.
Written by: Chris Carter, etc.
Starring: Lance Henriksen, Terry O’Quinn, Megan Gallagher
 
Though The ­X-Files was the runaway success that launched a dozen careers and became a science fiction hit whose popularity has endured long after its cancellation, my money for creator Chris Carter’s best work still goes to one of his other shows. Going into its highly anticipated debut episode, Millennium had all the ingredients necessary to make it as big as The X-Files. Unfortunately, it never caught on quite the way it should have. The series had to struggle endlessly to find a wide audience, but a far darker plot kept it out of the understanding of most viewers. Eventually, network indifference and a schizophrenic approach to its story arcs and character-development eventually crushed the show after only three seasons. But like anything that’s never quite understood or fully appreciated in its time, a devoted following to the series continues to this day.
 
It’s well known amongst the show’s fans that Chris Carter developed the series with genre veteran Lance Henriksen in mind. You won’t have to travel very far into the series to figure out his logic. Henriksen has always been a vastly underrated actor, proving that with great roles in everything from Aliens to Pumpkinhead to The Terminator to Powder. But his recognition never seems to go very far beyond horror and science fiction fans. Which isn’t terribly fair, given how well he carried Millennium as its star. It’s easy to see why Carter wanted him. No one else could play a character like Frank Blank, a burnt-out former FBI agent who takes on a job with a mysterious group known as MillenniuM. A sort-of fourth-branch organization dedicated to cases involving crimes connected to the possible end-of-the-world that may or may not go down in the new millennium. But it’s not just the fact that Frank is gifted forensics expert that draws this group to him. It’s his ability to see into the mind of a killer simply by visiting the crime scene, a gift that has aided and haunted Frank through his entire life.
 
Henriksen has always had a penchant for dark personalities, but very few of those roles ever involve a heroic element as well. Frank is also a family man with a wife (Megan Gallagher) and daughter (Brittany Tiplady), and it’s his desire to protect them from the evil of the world and the evil that may or may not be headed for their front door that forces his hand. Frank wants something for his family that he just can’t have, and it becomes the driving point of his character and the element of his personality that Henriksen brings out again and through the first season. Starting with “Pilot” and moving into other essential season one episodes such as “Force Majeure”, “Covenant”, “Lamentation”, “Powers, Principalities, Thrones and Dominions” and numerous others. Henriksen was and still is a good enough actor to set the tone for a character like Frank Black early on and make him as real and engaging as any fictional character could hope to be. We do learn more about him through the season, but the real development of the series is in the relationships he has with both his family and the people he encounters in his work.
 
Like any other Chris Carter series, the supporting cast more than holds up their end of the deal. The chemistry between Henriksen and Megan Gallagher is undeniable and excellently done by both. We don’t need to see them getting it on or constantly expressing how much they care for each other to get a sense of how much they love one another, and the lengths to which Frank will go to make his wife feel safe. Gallagher would get her own chance to develop her character further in the episode “The Well-Worn Lock”, and she makes the most of it. By the excellent final season finale, Katherine Black is more than just filler and a means to push a story forward. She is just as significant a part of the show as Frank.
 
Terry O’Quinn, who has achieved some much-deserved success in recent years for his portrayal of John Locke on the hit series Lost also achieves a similar measure with his character, Peter Watts, Frank’s contact within MilleniuM and eventual friend. O’Quinn has had a long history with damn near everything Chris Carter ever created, appearing in not only The X-Files and the first X-Files movie but also in Harsh Realm. Millennium was probably his longest association with a Carter series. Thanks to the consistently excellent writing and O’Quinn’s own talent for playing the kind of government official you would either love to have on your side or hate to have working against you, Peter Watts becomes as important to the series overall growth and development as Frank and Katherine. Like Katherine, his character is not just there to give Frank someone to talk to. The friendship that develops between the two becomes yet another point of interest for the series. It all comes back to the talent of the cast and of course, the writers and directors as well.
 
Hard work that should have yielded far better results than it got. But so it goes. At least though, there’s three seasons worth of material to work with. The first season makes for some of the most under appreciated television of its time. Anyone who hasn’t given this show at least a curious glance will no doubt be pleasantly surprised at what they find.
 

Yojimbo (1961)

Directed by: Akira Kurosawa
Written by: Akira Kurosawa and Ryuzo Kikushima
Starring: Toshiro Mifune, Tatsuya Nakadai, Yoko Tsukasa
 
It’s well known by fans and scholars alike that iconic writer/director Akira Kurosawa had a great affinity for American film. Particularly, it would seem, the western and gangster genres. And though several of the classics from his almost intimidating body of the work in the 1950’s (Seven Samurai, Ikiru, Throne of Blood and several others) possesses hints of this love, it wasn’t until he got around to the story of a wandering ronin (also known as a samurai with no master) who finds his way into a small town controlled by two vicious gangs that he was able to truly do something with both genres.
 
And not just slap a samurai sword on them either. Yojimbo is a film as worthy as any of Kurosawa’s heavyweight dramas because like those other movies, Yojimbo retains its classic status for not only being an immensely fun and influential but also in the way it tears into the established themes of the genres it seeks to borrow from. Kurosawa-regular Toshiro Mifune as Sanjuro is hardly the standard western hero. He’s a contract player, willing to do any job for anyone at all—for a price. But upon arriving in this small town, from his first encounter with Gonji, the tavern owner (a great gallows-humor performance from Eijiro Tono) to his initial dealings with the two gangs, Sanjuro finds his own personal code of ethics so offended by the decadently over-the-top evil of the criminals around him that he opts instead to simply wipe them both out. Though again, there’s money involved.
 
The trademark of most Kurosawa films is the incredible attention to humanity. The stories are always sweeping in their ability to compel us through an emotional journey as complete as any film could achieve. But here, he doesn’t go for that. Everything is stylized, packed with comic book humor wrapped in a similar sort of violence. The film is larger-than-life personalities playing out a great action-film story across a battleground small town that lends itself quite well to the camera work from Kazuo Miyagawa and the set designs by Yoshiro Muraki. Seizaburo Kawazu as Seibei is the older of the two crime lords, running a brothel with his ruthless, conniving wife Orin (Isuzu Yamada hitting all the right evil bitch notes) and installing his own handpicked mayor (Kamatari Fujiwara). Kyu Sazanka as Ushitoria is the more powerful crime boss of the two, wielding far more influence in the town with his sadistic brother (Daisuke Kato) and his own mayor-of-choice (Takashi Shimura). Both sides at certain points in the flawlessly paced film want Sanjuro to help them gain complete control. Sanjuro deals with all of them but secretly has no intention of helping any side but his own. To him, both groups are pitiful Roman-esque creatures of mindless murder and everything else he personally finds detestable. It’s this sense of honor that Mifune does so well, moving away from the subtlety of his past performances but still maintaing his reputation for being capable of a truly impressive range. There is no secret to Sanjuro’s motivations and personality. He is by far the greatest symbol of the film’s frenzied, almost light-hearted approach to its story. Sanjuro is quickly shown to be far more cunning than anyone else in the film. There is almost never a moment when he is not in complete control of his surroundings. And in those rare moments when he isn’t, he moves quickly to change that back to his favor.
 
There’s nothing deep to it. The key word here is fun. Mifune really doesn’t need to do anything more than stand tall with a sense of power that dominates the entire film and easily makes him a hero of considerable appeal. And much of it is laid out in casual movements and gestures. Such a simple shrug of his shoulders or the way drawing his sword to make a kill is as a common a thing to him as breathing. He goes about his job with the mindset of a man who isn’t afraid to have a good time screwing these guys over while taking the work deathly serious at the same time. It takes a very special sort of movie-star confidence to create a character like this. Mifune is perfect for it on every level. From his first appearance walking into town against Masaru Sato’s perfect score, he is already unforgettable. Enough that the influence of not only his character but also the film itself is still felt today.
 
Of all Kurosawa’s films, Yojimbo is the one that had the greatest influence on Western filmmaking. With its creation came Sergio Leone’s A Fistful of Dollars in 1961. An almost shot-for-shot remake of Kurosawa’s film, the movie not only created the spaghetti western genre and launched one of the most important film careers of the last thirty years (Clint Eastwood, anyone?). The film has since seen a thousand imitators, an officially endorsed depression-era gangster film starring Bruce Willis and even an Anime adaptation. Dollars though remains the most famous of the sincerest form of flattery. It still doesn’t hold a candle to its predecessor. A legendary performance from Mifune, an excellent group of supporting actors playing their full-tilt roles to perfection and all the technical tricks and tools that again and again made Kurosawa and his films a genre onto themselves. Looking to get your feet wet with one of the masters? Start here.
 

True Stories (1986)

Directed by: David Byrne
Written by: David Byrne, Beth Henley, Stephen Tobolowsky
Starring: David Byrne, John Goodman, Swoosie Kurtz 
 
In a previous installment of Adventures in Netflix, I reviewed Snakes on a Plane, New Line Cinema’s attempt at a production-line cult film. I said then and still believe now that a movie like Snakes will always be doomed to fail in its ambition against movies that gained their cult-status the old-fashioned way. Earning it through years of existence in the potentially never-ending limbo of video rentals and word-of-mouth. The best ones have, anyway.
 
David Byrne’s writing/directing project True Stories is something of a combination of anthology storytelling and the usual offbeat social and political leanings of Byrne’s better-known endeavor. Namely, leading the Rock and Roll Hall of Famers The Talking Heads. If you’re familiar with the music, then you’ll have a little less work to do getting into the world Byrnes leads us through. Armed with a Stetson hat and a number of questions regarding the nature of people and of life itself, the film is basically Byrnes taking us on a tour of a Virgil, Texas, a fictional backdrop home to a number of strange townspeople and a “Celebration of Specialness” festival that dictates much of the film’s very loose plot.
 
The story, co-written by Beth Henley and Stephen Tobolowsky (who most us know best as Ned Ryerson, the irritating insurance salesman who only adds to Bill Murray’s déjà vu misery in Groundhog Day) plays like a ninety-minute long Talking Heads music video. Indeed, the musical highlight for any fan of the group will almost certainly be the scene in which the band and several members of the cast (which includes Goodman showing off his moonwalking skills) tear through the classic “Wild Wild Life”. The same scene later saw heavily airplay on MTV as the music video for the song. It really shouldn’t surprise anyone that the entire score consists of music by Byrnes and also The Talking Heads. But even if you’re not a fan of their music, it’s nothing too overwhelming.
 
And even if it does, the real pleasure of the film is not in the music (though people already tuned into Byrne’s brand of music will consider it a huge plus that so many great songs populate the movie throughout) but in likable and considerable talents of the diverse supporting cast. In one of his first starring roles as a shy man named Louis, Goodman is by far the standout of the film as lonely, completely decent man who loves country music and tries to put an end to his loneliness by advertising for a wife in the form of a billboard and then later in a hilarious TV commercial. Goodman would go on to utilize his sizable comedic talent and dramatic punch in such venues as Roseanne, Sea of Love¸ The Big Lebowski, and countless appearances on Saturday Night Live. But this is the place to go for a first glance at the potential he would utilize to full effect in future projects. His rendition of the classic “People Like Us” is not to be missed. Other highlights on Byrne’s freefalling trip through Virgil, interrupted only by the occasional musical interlude (most of which blend into the film quite well) include a man (Spalding Grey in one of his best roles) who hasn’t spoken to his wife in twenty years, the delightful Swoosie Kurtz as a millionaire who refuses to leave the safety of her bed, Jo Harvey Allen as a pathological who seemingly spends every moment of her day laying out the history of her completely impossible life and several others. Including Pops Staples, of The Staple Singers, as a voodoo expert who helps Louis in his love-life problems.
 
If you don’t care for The Talking Heads and have no interest in giving them a shot, the cast and their stories interweaving with one another to paint a fairly interesting portrait of small town oddity is pretty much all True Stories can offer you. If that doesn’t sound like it’s going to be enough, then you probably won’t miss out. Even if the movie’s deliberately wry charm and dedication to a detached sense of bemusement at its own strangeness wears out its welcome before the end, everyone else should have a pretty good time.
 
And that’s gonna lock up another issue of Adventures in Netflix.
 
Join me next month, when I detail my journey hunting down the rotten bastards responsible for canceling Back To You.
 
As always, thanks for sticking around.
 
I have something to say about the difference between American and European cities. But I’ve forgotten what it is. I have it written down at home though.”
-David Byrne, laying down his wisdom in True Stories.
 

The Killers (1964)-Roberto Azula

June 2nd, 2008

The Killers (1964)

By Roberto Azula
 
Don Siegel’s The Killers was originally intended to be a made-for-TV movie, but NBC deemed it far too violent. You’ll see why in its shocking first ten minutes. Lee Marvin and Clu Gulager play two professional hitmen who are not above terrifying a blind librarian to track down their prey. From that rather unsettling opening, this very unorthodox gangster flick turns into a more nuanced exploration of life’s motivations. Charlie Strom (Marvin) is baffled by the fact the racecar driver he was sent to kill did nothing to escape his fate. Strom is also puzzled by the inflated fee he was paid for such an easy hit. Why a hitman would even consider these questions could only explained in terms of an existential quandary. And that is precisely what The Killers is—an existential film. Through a series of flashbacks, the film tells a tale of once promising career degenerating into failure, crime, and paralyzing fatalism.
 
Lee Marvin delivers an astonishing performance, his trademark gravely, taciturn voice slicing through each scene like a gunshot through a silencer. Gulager is also fantastic as Marvin’s right-hand man and fellow "investigator" Lee, a barely-controlled psychopath that plays Even Worse Cop to Strom’s Bad Cop. And yes, even Ronald Reagan gives a good show, in his cheesy way.
 
Though it was made in 1964, The Killers has a very 70s feel to it, shot in vivid made-for-TV colors. Despite the opening film titles, the film has next to nothing to do with Ernest Hemingway’s short story. Be that as it may, Siegel’s version still tackles the same themes of the original story, and I can only imagine Hemingway would have enjoyed the film anyway. A most curious period piece and a harbinger of Siegel’s later tough guy masterpieces, The Killers is at once a cool and beguiling film. It doesn’t get much more hardboiled than this.
 

Copyright C. 2008 Roberto Azula

Smart People (2008)-Patrick Wood

June 2nd, 2008

Smart People (2008)

By Patrick Wood
 
If somehow Smart People, a new ‘dramedy’ penned by novelist Mark Poirier and directed by newcomer Noam Muro, gains enough traction among mainstream audiences, don’t be alarmed if it makes a surprise appearance in a venomous Hillary stump speech. The film’s white, upper-middle class, Pennsylvanian intellectuals could have walked straight onto screen from an Obama rally. But, Hillary would rasp, they don’t know how to relate to the blue-collar working class! They’re elitists! They harass Thomas Haden Church and can’t open up to Sarah Jessica Parker! Clap, cheer, cackle, cough. 
 
For moviegoers clamoring for another chance to watch a curmudgeonly, pot-bellied writer with a penchant for pleated khakis and corduroy jackets simultaneously hate others and himself, all on the big screen, today marks an occasion for wild celebration. Lawrence Weatherhold (Dennis Quaid) is in a rut. Widowed and failing to push his recent book (on literary criticism) into publication, Quaid’s college professor lashes out by parking illegally, not learning his students’ names and berating his son for spending too much money at the campus bookstore. With the crash landing of his adopted brother Chuck (Haden Church) in the guest bedroom, Lawrence gets a new human dartboard, complete with ghastly Fu Manchu and ass-less jumpsuit nightie.
 
The downside of Lawrence’s stubborn belligerence, unsurprisingly, proves to be the springboard for his personal journey when it lands him in the hospital. See, when campus security finally tows his double-parked car, Lawrence scales a fence to retrieve his briefcase. A seizure, and an especially equine Sarah Jessica Parker as a former student with a remnant crush on her old professor, follows. No longer able to drive himself, Lawrence (who demands to sit in the back seat because riding in the passenger side of the car makes him nauseous) must subject himself to the company of his adopted relative and a potential romantic interest for transportation. 
 
Bearded and soft, Quaid brings an appropriate amount of weariness to the role. His old, blue eyes convey all the undercurrents of self-loathing and insecurity rushing under Lawrence’s gruff, arrogant exterior. The belated arrival of this performance invites inevitable comparisons to Jeff Daniels in The Squid and The Whale and Paul Giamatti in Sideways and while Quaid’s performance isn’t as revelatory as either of those two, it should prove a vehicle more encouraging than not in establishing some sort of stock in the concept of The Rookie star as a legitimate indie leading man.
 
But Parker, who has failed (intentionally) in The Family Stone and (unintentionally) in Failure to Launch to ignite any sparks with the male costars of her recent roles, doesn’t quite fit as the doctor to fix Quaid’s professor. Her character (Janet Hartigan) jumps from one big decision to another, without much explanation or credibility. A two-pronged effort, Parker’s stoniness and Poirier’s lazy scripting, keep us at bay from Hartigan and, consequently, her romance with Lawrence.     
 
Not to say that Smart People doesn’t yield anything interesting in the way of female character development. Vanessa Wetherhold, as played by Ellen Page, is a bitchy Young Republican who actually admires her father for his self-absorption. Confident but lonely, precocious but naïve, Vanessa doesn’t so much venture beyond the trappings of Page’s ironic persona as make them feel new again. Her scenes with Hayden Church’s stoner delinquent prove to be some of the most fascinating, and delicate, in the film. 
 
Even with its flaws, Poirier’s script is smarter than those of most films in either the local multiplex or arthouse at the moment. Full of snappy dialogue, unusually accurate portrayals of academic life, and enough quirks to keep the swiftly paced plotting from seeming overbearingly conventional, Smart People rarely bores. But it lacks that something else, the glimpse into the Santa Ynez wine culture of Sideways or the gut-wrenching blow-by-blow of a parents’ separation in The Squid and the Whale, to warrant any major attention. I doubt it’ll even make it onto Hillary’s radar.
 
Copyright C. 2008 Patrick Wood

Street Kings (2008)-Oliver X.

June 2nd, 2008

Street Kings (2008)

By Oliver X.
 
Street Kings is another Keanu Reeves live-action can-you-see-my-lips mov-ie. Taking a page in non-facial emoting from David Carradine’s Kwai Chang Caine handbook (circa 1972), our alcoholic, widower hero is stiff like a mannequin, but he ain’t panickin’ in the face of kidnappin’ Korea townies, liquor store assassins and deep cover turncoats. 
 
With more method in his lazy left eye than in Reeves’ entire body of work, Forest Whitaker (here as LAPD Vice Unit Captain Jack Walker, bff to Reeves’ Tom Ludlow), plays Tigger against Keanu’s maniacal Vice Dick Pooh. I would loved to have heard the outtake dialogue from the Oscar winner’s scenes with Reeves: "Come on Key, just one more sip of this Red Bull Nitro should do the trick." "But Forest, this is my fourth can!"
 
LA noir novelist James Ellroy’s screenplay is weighted by an absurdist back-story and poorly realized plotlines, pitting Ludlow against the more rogue elements of a notoriously racist, us-against-them, urban enforcer culture that permeates both real and fictional accounts of the LAPD. Veteran of both the Watts and Rodney King riots, infamous former LAPD Chief Darryl "Chokehold" Gates, makes a cameo in full uniform–just for authenticity.
 
Ludlow must extract himself from an ignoble connection to the brutal murder of his former partner, who has accused him of persistent misuse of deadly force against predominantly minority suspects. Too bad the producers didn’t extract Reeves from this role in place of, say, an actor.
 
The supporting cast also disappoints. Hugh Laurie (Fox’s House) is forgettable as an Internal Affairs honcho, who hounds Ludlow and appears to be nursing a serious man crush for the Zen master. Cedric the Entertainer is unintentionally funny—ok pathetic–as a drug dealer turned cowardly snitch, who drives the loudest ride in the hood: a blood orange drop top de Ville (with matching pimp sweats and kangol sold separately). Chi Town rapper Common continues to grow in each film he’s in, but is wasted here, despite three convincingly menacing screen minutes in the denouement.
 
Street Kings has the distinction of being the first action drama of the season to swap cheap thrills for z’s. Sleep well sweet movie-goer; I’ll give Ellroy the news.
 
Copyright C. 2008 Oliver X.

Casino Royale (2007)-Leslie Dufresne

June 2nd, 2008

Casino Royale (2007)

By Leslie Dufresne
 
I have a confession. I’ve never been a James Bond fan. To tell the truth, I’ve never understood all the fuss over Sean Connery and frankly, I get irritated over all the endless debates and questions, “Who’s your favorite Bond?” But I’ve got to admit, I’ll be venturing out to see each and every Daniel Craig–Bond portrayal from this day forward until the day he is replaced by some poor chap who will have to fill his shoes. Pierce Brosnan, who are you?
 
After a high-impact opening fight scene, the typical cheesy opening credits and a dramatically dull and uneventful scene written to establish Bond’s future adversaries (a Ugandan warlord, the middle-man Mr. White, and Le Chiffre–financial investor to terrorists, played by Mads Mikkelsen) I began to think it was all the same Bond. But quickly I was corrected. Starting in Madagascar, this tight, compact-sized Bond sets his new screen career afire in a chase that would put the Road Runner and Wile E. Coyote to shame. He leaps and bounds after a gun-for-hire who is refreshingly Spiderman-like and equally impressive. They are tumbling and bouncing like monkeys all over a construction site, breaking through walls and dodging bullets. This new Bond is a machine– hardly resembling the Bonds of the past: typically middle-aged, gadget-dependent old fogies I had such a disinterest in ever getting to know.
 
While I am at the edge of my seat already and fifteen minutes has yet to pass, M is not impressed. It seems that 007 had been newly promoted and Judi Dench’s character is quick to rethink it. After the chase leads to a botched end and blood on MI6’s hands, M demands Bond think up a holiday before she demotes him. He’s then off to the Bahamas to trail an associate linked to Le Chiffre. His name is Dimitrios and Bond is quick to win the guy’s Aston Martin at poker and seduce the thug’s buxom wife all in one breath. Bond follows Dimitrios to Miami’s International Airport to inadvertently foil a plot to bomb an Airbus. Once again, Craig is off on a tear, he’s the Energizer Bunny, part man, part mechanical, his battery never running out. In a screenplay written by Neal Purvis, Robert Wade, and Paul Haggis, their creativity as writers never runs out either, each chase is as good as the last, the drama of this story building and building. 
 
M sends Bond off to Montenegro to challenge Le Chiffre at a high-stakes poker match. En route, he meets his financier, Vesper Lynd, an accountant for the British government. Vesper is portrayed by Eva Green, and with her regal good looks and raspy low voice, she is not the typically vacuous Bond Barbie doll. There is credibility and intrigue to her character. Their caddy banter back and forth sheds a bit of light onto Craig’s range as an actor. It’s the first time we hear consistent dialogue from his smooth, almost soothing, voice and for a little while I felt I could have been watching him in a Jane Austen period piece. How fascinating, since I had agreed with M when she had referred to him as a “blunt instrument” earlier.
 
Now scenes with card games are usually time to tune-out for me. However, Bond’s and Le Chiffre’s equal display of panache and swagger make the poker showdown mesmerizing. Le Chiffre’s skill in bluffing or non-bluffing or whatever and Bond’s skill in reading it had me in awe and made me want to pick up a copy of “Poker for Dummies”. The match culminates at a torture scene that is written with such unexpected wit and ingenuity, it diffuses much of the agony making it one of the more humorous scenes in the film.
 
Martin Campbell of Mask of Zorro fame is credited with direction of Casino Royale. There is not one slow spot in all of the 144 minutes. The action sequences are electrifying yet credible at the same time, never over-the-top in the way that John Woo action scenes come to mind. Craig looks to be doing many of his own stunts and there are few, if any, special effects. Campbell relies on the slickness of the script and the charisma of his leading man to carry the story. He’s not afraid to give his new Bond all the characteristics of a “blunt instrument”– raw, bloodied, gritty, cocky, brutish– thus shedding all the unnecessary and antiquated 007 clichés and gimmicks of years past.
 
I suppose it would be an understatement to say that I’m recommending this movie. It’s been awhile since I could say I’ve been completely enraptured with a film that I’d succumb to watching again and again. There are very few movies that do that for me. But as Bond utters his last line of the film, we realize that what is past has been prologue to a new chapter that has only just begun.
 
Copyright C. 2008 Leslie Dufresne

Atonement (2007)-Leslie Dufresne

June 2nd, 2008

Atonement (2007)

By Leslie Dufresne
 
Keira Knightley’s character, Elizabeth Bennett, portrayed in 2005’s Pride and Prejudice had an affinity for walking everywhere. I believed director Joe Wright’s depiction of Elizabeth’s affection for walking to be true to form and captured beautifully. However after recently viewing his latest project, Atonement, with his muse, Knightley, again as the main character– this time as Cecilia Tallis, I realized that Joe Wright is the one with the obsession for walking, hence bringing me to the conclusion that it really wasn’t his keen interpretation of the Austen character but rather his own personal taste as a director. This conclusion is exemplified in his latest film where any one of his characters can be seen taking a stroll within exquisitely framed compositions in this sweeping WWII drama. It made me wonder if Wright believed that it held some dramatic affect that added to the tension. The tension certainly mounted in me as I watched everyone partake in his/her own personal walk-a-thon. Unfortunately, this was all a little too pedestrian for me (pun absolutely intended) however I had yet to discover that this would still turn out to be a compelling romantic war drama.
 
The story’s plot line is about as rail thin as Keira Knightly’s body. It begins with a day-in-the-life of the wealthy Tallis family during a scorching summer day in 1935 in London which includes Knightly vigorously leaping out of her sprawling estate’s fountain, not once but twice. What follows is one of the most obscenely vulgar words divulged before the most innocent of eyes (not to mention some dumbfounded audience members), an over the top soundtrack intertwining typewriter and piano keys, steamy sex in a library, a salacious crime, a life-shattering lie, and did I mention walking? It may seem like a bit, but what I just covered lies just in the first thirty to forty five minutes. What’s left of the film is even more scantily clad.
 
To be fair, the movie has an intriguing premise. Thirteen-year-old Briony Tallis, played by Saoirse Ronan (say that name) is an eccentric little budding writer, who has just finished her stage play about love, ironically. Her alluring older sister Cecelia is secretly attracted to a housekeeper’s son, Robbie Turner (James McAvoy) who returns that attraction. Being a writer, Briony’s outlandish imagination clouds her perception of reality. The young girl observes an erotic encounter between Cecelia and Robbie down by the fountain and during the course of the next twelve hours, comes face-to-face with three more highly charged sexual situations that would have left an adult of the clearest mental health in a catatonic state let alone a glassy-eyed thirteen year old residing in the 1930’s English countryside.
 
The last eye-opener for Briony is a rape of her fifteen-year-old cousin Lola. Briony falsely indicts Robbie for the crime and Robbie is then sent off to jail for three to four years. He is released under the condition that he will fight in the war. Now, I had already believed the film to be a tad lacking in plot meat, but there was no way I could have foreseen the upcoming famine of the next hour. We follow Robbie as he meanders the streets of Dunkirk, ailing, dehydrated, and still lovesick for Cecelia as he waits for the evacuation. Briony is eighteen and working as a nurse, as is Cecelia. Many of the scenes are illusions, fantasies stemming from Robbie’s and Briony’s minds that made me realize that even less is occurring on screen than what we were really seeing. By the end of the film, I didn’t know what was real and what was imagined.
 
Having said all this, the strength of the film lies in its details. I began to read Ian McEwan’s novel and came to realize that what’s substituted for plot is perspective. When I viewed the movie a second time, I sat back and enjoyed the presentation. Many of the scenes are repeated, due to various points of view, hence Knightley springing from the fountain twice. Capturing double perspectives of key events squeezed out ample time to reveal plot points, however I realized that this wasn’t the purpose of the film. McEwan’s prose is lush and detailed and Joe Wright’s elaborate interpretation of the novelist’s work is spot on though heavily laborious.
 
I am recommending this film if you care to see it twice, as I did. Maybe you’re one to enjoy a movie for its aesthetics or you’re one that likes a movie to get to the point. This is not the latter. While light on plot, the visuals are stunning and the performances are engaging especially from McAvoy, which left me wanting more and longing to experience it again, without the personal Boston marathons.
 
Copyright C. 2008 Leslie Dufresne
 
 
 

Speed Racer (2008)-Kanaka Sathasivan

June 2nd, 2008

Speed Racer (2008)

By Kanaka Sathasivan
 
American moviegoers, I’d wager, probably fit neatly into two groups: those who nostalgically remember that bubbly cartoon from the 60s about the boy who was born to race, and those who couldn’t care less. If you’re in the latter group, let me say right now, you probably won’t enjoy this movie. But if like me you’re part of that first group, Speed Racer is a non-stop thrill ride through childhood that will keep you entertained to the last frame.
 
As a young boy, Speed Racer’s only ambition was to race cars like his record-setting older brother Rex. But one day, after an attempt on his life by a rival, Rex leaves the family, compelled to fight his demons alone to protect his loved ones. When Speed grows up, he takes up his brother’s mantle, striving to become one of the best racers in the world.
 
However, in his way stands Royalton, a giant automobile manufacturer who understands that races are much more than entertainment and can be manipulated in order to strengthen or weaken company stocks. Seeing the young boy’s potential, he offers Speed a position on Royalton Industries’ racing team, assuring him that racers alone are insignificant and every last Grand Prix has been fixed by corporate moguls. Though shocked by this revelation, Speed cannot betray his values or his family’s own independent automobile company and turns down the opportunity.
 
Enraged, Royalton vows to destroy Speed and his family, but the mysterious Racer X, Speed’s rival, has discovered Royalton’s game and sets out to expose him. Realizing this is the same cause for which his brother was fighting, Speed deceives his family, joining Racer X in a dangerous cross-country rally, the Crucible, in order to defeat Royalton and prove his own strength as a racer.
 
In Speed Racer, Larry and Andy Wachowski once again transport viewers into an incredible world, plucked directly from the imagination and manifested in flawless CGI. Every color is super-saturated, every silhouette over-exaggerated, every scene transition accompanied by a classic wipe (and often a floating head). It is a cartoon world manifested into being as if from the mind of a child—a mix of realism and fantasy that has never before been seen in a movie.
 
At its core, Speed Racer is a film for children and children-at-heart, but sometimes seems stuck in trying to decide which audience to please. While the spiritually young may find the comic nature of the movie tedious, the physically young will be bored by the exposition and confused by the complicated plot—it is quite easy to forgive the dual nature of the film, but the attempt to incorporate both elements only half-succeeds.
 
The real strength of the Wachowskis’ movie lies it its powerful characters, played by perfectly-cast actors. The character development, although shallow, plays out in the form of flashbacks, interspersed inside longer actions sequences. The movie’s revelation of what the family has been through tugs at the audience’s heartstrings, making us root for Speed all the more, and the corporate selfishness of the villain sparks our desire to see Speed dole out sweet justice.
 
And really, this is where the movie succeeds with both audiences. The battle between loving family and industrial tyrant unfolds on the race track, and the tension of knowing the stakes makes each death-defying automobile clash even more thrilling. The incredible visuals and action suck you in, keeping you on the edge of your seat. At one point when Speed prevailed, I nearly pumped my fist into the air, and at another breathtaking moment, a child behind me yelled, “Go, Speed, Go!”
 
For followers of the show, the movie is very faithful in plot, style, and spirit. The dialogue and direction are enjoyably kitschy, maintaining the humor and innocence of the original cartoon. Fans will also appreciate glimpses of that iconic theme song, incorporated into a glorious score by Michael Giacchin that strikes at all the right moments and sticks with you as you leave. (People singing the familiar tune were in no short supply when the movie ended.)
 
The racing is probably the appeal of the movie to many casual movie-watchers, and the action definitely delivers. Every race is a fast-paced, trick-laden color show. The stunts are incredible, the tracks breathtaking, and the cars gorgeous. The film also manages to cram in martial arts fights, assassins, violent car chases, and even piranhas, none of which seem out of place in this world of competitive racing.
 
Although Speed Racer isn’t for everyone, it’s a dazzling movie that transported me back to my younger days. Every cheesy stunt replicated from the cartoon put a smile on my face, and seeing Speed defeat Royalton, though expected, was unexpectedly satisfying. The greatest testament to the film’s power, however, came after the credits had rolled, when I climbed in my car afterwards, drove onto the highway, and heard that engine rev. I couldn’t help but grin.
 
Copyright C. 2008 Kanaka Sathasivan

Iron Man (2008)-Kanaka Sathasivan

June 2nd, 2008

Iron Man (2008)

By Kanaka Sathasivan
 
After the dismal failure of Batman and Robin in 1997, the market for comic-book movies was largely dried up. While there were small successes in the genre with movies such as Blade, and some larger success with X-Men, it wasn’t until 2002’s Spider-Man that the genre finally returned en force. As summer turnout for Spider-Man broke box-office records, producers went to work; in the years following, dozens of movies were released, hoping to cash in on the same market. Marvel Studios created franchises out of every major character in their arsenal, double the number of DC movies, but none were able to replicate the success of Spider-Man.
 
Within the genre of comic-book movies, there are a great variety of adaptations. Some, like Sin City, are simply moving comic books, while others like Batman Begins, are barely comic-book movies at all, but rather serious films that happen to feature comic-book characters and lore. Arguably, Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 (we shall never again speak of Spider-Man 3) succeeded in the genre where others failed because Sam Raimi found that ideal balance between the narrative style dictated by the medium of film and the fantastic elements found in comic book canon. The result was two films enjoyable to both movie audiences and comic-book fans that have long been heralded as some of the best comic-book adaptations to date (Spider-Man 2 wins the top spot in my book, if we don’t count Batman Begins).
 
So why am I explaining all this? To bring home the significance of my next statement. Taking all of this into consideration, you’ll understand what I mean when I say: Step aside Spider-Man 2; the genre has a new king.
 
Iron Man is, simply put, the best comic-book film I’ve seen to date. The writing is clever and witty, the acting pitch-perfect, the mesh of realism and fantasy seamless, and the action thrilling. While I know there will be a number of people who disagree with my crowning of Iron Man, there is no denying that the movie is both a faithful adaptation and an amazing film.
 
Once a young genius, now a billionaire inventor, Tony Stark walks fast, talks fast, lives fast, and has little patience for those who don’t. As the movie opens, Stark Industries is the premiere weapons manufacturer for the United States military, and Stark himself has personally come to Afghanistan to demonstrate the power of their newest missile, the weapon you only have to shoot once: the Jericho.
 
But after his military escort convoy is attacked, Stark is captured by terrorist forces and commanded to build them said missile. When provided with materials from the very weapons he built to stop such terrorists, Stark realizes his life-long work has not only helped protect his country and people, but simultaneously provided his enemies with the means to destroy them.
 
Trapped, Stark agrees to build the weapon, but instead, secretly erects a suit of iron. After escaping, he is shaken by the thought that Stark Industries technology is in the wrong hands. He vows never to manufacture a weapon again, much to the dismay of his partner Obadiah Stane. After building a new, sleeker suit, Stark strives to correct the damage he’s already done and prevent any future abuse of the weapons he spent his life creating. But expectedly, there are those who are unwilling to accept his change of heart or humor his vigilantism, including not only Stane but the government he used to work for.
 
Visually, Iron Man delivers everything you’d expect, so excuse me for skipping over the customary praise of the graphics, cinematography, sets, and art direction (unless you would like this review to go on for another 200 words). While the action is short, it’s definitely pretty sweet: well-choreographed, suspenseful, and exhilarating, occurring in timely bursts that don’t overtake the movie. My only qualm with the film is the lack of a strong soundtrack or recognizable orchestral theme; the end was the only time I felt the swell of the music and when you see it, you’ll understand why. However, this is a minor complaint and really, something I failed to notice until it was pointed out to me.
 
Back to the good stuff. The true appeal of Iron Man lies not only the clever writing and pacing, but in the charm of every actor involved, from the biggest names to the smallest bit parts. Robert Downey Jr. plays the title character with such ease and humor, it’s easy to forget you’re watching a movie. The success of his performance stems not from the obvious but from the understated. For example, there is no need to tell us Stark is an alcoholic; the ever-present half-empty glass and his uninhibited behavior and mannerisms reveal all that’s needed.
 
Gwyneth Paltrow as his assistant is not only an amazing addition but also perhaps the best-cast actress in any comic-book movie in recent memory. Generally, the women in such movies are meant to be flimsy yet strong, but Margot Kidder was really the only actress in the genre who managed to create a memorable character. Paltrow’s Pepper Potts is the refreshing female lead we’ve been looking for since 1978: a classy, confident, capable woman who manages to organize Stark’s entire life while remaining social and independent; show emotion, yet stay composed; and mostly impressively, run for her life wearing stiletto heels on grating.
 
Of course, cast aside, much of the credit goes to director Jon Favreau for bringing this ambitious vision to life. The movie is an uncompromising genre piece, with nowhere near the dark realism of Batman Begins, but also with fewer comic-book clichés than Spider-Man. The events, the characters, the villains, and the surprise guest stars are at once credible and incredible in the world Favreau creates. While the importance of some of the characters might be lost on casual movie-goers, their inclusion does little to detract from the spectacle of the movie.
 
I think there are few people who would dislike this movie, and it is a must-see for any fan of the genre or really, movies in general. Iron Man delivers on all counts, an excellent beginning to the summer.
 
Copyright C. 2008 Kanaka Sathasivan

 

Jumper (2008)-Kanaka Sathasivan

June 2nd, 2008

Jumper (2008)

By Kanaka Sathasivan
 
I’ll have to admit, I wanted to see this movie. Then the bad reviews poured in, and I still wanted to see this movie. And I’ll happily say it wasn’t nearly as bad as I thought it would be. But I only paid a dollar to see it, so I think I got my money’s worth.
 
Jumper is the story of David Rice an unhappy boy bullied at school and at home, with only one friend in the world, a girl named Millie. After an unfortunate accident, David discovers he has the power to transport. Immediately, he uses the newfound gift to escape his old life, steal large amounts of cash, and create a new persona for himself.
 
Fast-forward a decade, and Rice is now living the life anyone would kill for, breakfast in Britain, lunch in Egypt; even the most menial task is accomplished quicker by his powers. And of course, did I mention the stacks of cash, from every country on earth? But no one can ever live the perfect life of crime under the radar. As long as there have been Jumpers, there have been Paladins, religious hunters who feel only God should have the power to be everywhere at once. The rest of the movie that follows is a spectacular chase between the Paladins, Rice, as he tries to protect Millie, and Griffin, another Jumper.
 
The best part of the movie is undoubtedly the graphics and stunts. The powers possessed by these two boys are fantastic and watching them do these incredible things excites that spark in everyone who ever wished they could close their eyes and teleport. The most endearing and realistic part about their “jumping” is that it was never perfect, often leaving tell-tale destruction and a discernible “scar” in the air. Not only was this a visual tactic, but a valuable plot device as well.
 
However, the incredible action was sadly accompanied by a lackluster plot and ill-defined characters. Rice’s backstory is buried somewhere in all the action, and the discovery he makes about his long-lost mother is interesting, but not explored enough to sate the audience. Millie is never allowed to grow as a character on her own, instead serving only to further the plot with her feminine wiles and naïve demands—she is simply just another damsel-in-distress; a young girl relegated to playing the victim while the adults duke it out.
 
While Hayden Christensen and Rachel Bilson are capable young actors, neither of them have Samuel L. Jackson’s presence; it often feels like his movie over Christensen’s. Even Griffin, played by a grown up Jamie Bell, overshadows Christensen. But all in all, the cast has excellent chemistry together.
 
Other high points include the score, done by John Powell, and the cinematography, by Barry Peterson. But neither of these things is enough to make up for the low points. Jumper is definitely not a must-see, and it will probably disappoint anyone with high expectations. But as far as action films go, it’s not horrible.
 

Copyright C. 2008 Kanaka Sathasivan

Southland Tales (2006) -Eric Smith

June 2nd, 2008

Southland Tales (2006)

By Eric Smith
 
When you add two popular pop stars, a former pro wrestler, three SNL alums, this generation’s scream-queen and Stifler from the American Pie films, it sounds like a pretty good ingredient for a movie, right? Well, it could’ve been and it should’ve been. The result is this over-blown, over-the-top mess of a movie, that 99% of the time, doesn’t even make sense.
 
The story is narrated by Justin Timberlake. He plays an actor who was sent into war because of the draft, and is now a war hero. In between his spouting scripture, he informs us that, in 2005, WWIII broke out when foreign militaries nuked the U.S. Now it’s 2008 (near future because it takes place in July) and the world is in growing chaos. The war rages on between multiple countries and there seems to be no sign of letting up. He introduces us to the story’s main focus, Dwayne Johnson (formerly known as "The Rock" for those of you who can’t seem to wrap your heads around his real name), who plays a former boxer who has woken up in the desert with amnesia. He’s dating a former porn star (Sarah Michelle Gellar), now a pop star/screenwriter/TV show host (?). Together, they have written a screenplay that more than likely has something to with how the world will actually end. What he doesn’t know is that he’s really married to the daughter of the Vice Presidential Candidate (Mandy Moore). Meanwhile, there’s a gang of idiot terrorists, part of the Neo-Marxist group, who have their own agenda.
 
They have kidnapped the twin cop brother of one of their own (Seann William Scott) and plan to use him in a staged killing or something. There’s also a crazy Nobel Prize winner (Wallace Shawn, sporting one of the worst hairdos in cinema history), who’s unveiled a new technological thing involving the use of the ocean to power cars (another thing that confused me), as well as his incredibly large zeppelin that makes the Hindenberg look like a toy. Now, there’s talk of assassinations and the idiot terrorists do stuff and Dwayne Johnson limps about as he attempts to figure out who he really is.
 
The main problem is, well, everything. The whole cast looks uncomfortable, the story delves into itself more and more, making less and less sense. The special effects are shoddy and the direction, by Richard Kelly (who’s last attempts were Domino and the more effective Donnie Darko) is off the mark here. This film is not only a huge mess, but it’s boring as well. You’d think with a cast this good, they’d be able to reach down in the muck and pull out something halfway decent, but not when you’re drudging through waste as bad as this.
 
Copyright C. 2008 Eric Smith